Psychiatric Association. 1980.
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn. Author: Washington,
Psychological Association. 1985.
for Educational and Psychological Testing. Author: Washington, DC.
Psychological Association. 1992.
principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist 47:
DP, Hart SD, Kropp PR, Webster CD. 1997.
for the Sexual Violence Risk-20. British Columbia Institute Against Family
Violence: Vancouver, BC (available from Psychological Assessment Resources,
Inc., Odessa, FL).
J, Law M, Hanson K. 1998.
prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered
offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 122: 123-142.
the clinical practice of violence risk assessment. American Psychologist 51
the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and
validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of
Research and Trearment 8: 37-54.
psychiatric and psychological testimony: Separating fact from fantasy. In: Wiley
Expert Witness Update. Wiley: New York; 167-208.
the evidentiary reliability of DSM-lV. American Journal of Forensic Psycholoy
F, Heil P, Marshall WL. 1996.
as a coping mechanism and its relationship to loneliness and intimacy deficits
in sexual offending. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Chicago, IL.
MD, Reidy TJ. 1998.
base rate data in violence risk assessments at capital sentencing. Behavioral
Sciences and the Law 16: 71-95.
v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 113 S. Ct. 2786.1993.
base rates, predictions of sex offender recidivism, and the "sexual
predator" commitment laws. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 16:
DL, Kaul JD, Huot SJ. 1995.
risk for recidivism for incarcerated sex offenders: Updated development on the
Sex Offender Screening Tool (SOST). Poster session presented to the annual
conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, New
v. Kenneth Wydell (MH99-JR9).
of March 24, 1999. Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013,1014 (D.C. Cir. 1993).
Community integration following institutional treatment. In: Juvenile Sex
Offending: Causes, Consequences, and Corrections, Ryan GD, Lane SL (eds).
Lexington: Toronto; 377-390.
T, Tornkins AJ. 1996.
violence risk assessments. American Psycologist 51: 928-930.
WM, Meehl PE. 1996.
efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical,
algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology,
Public Policy, and Law 2: 293-323.
Development of a Brief Actuarial Scale for Sexual Offense Recidivism. Onawa.
Public Works and Government Services of Canada.
do we know about sex offender risk assessment? Psychology, Public Policy,
and Law 4: 50- 72.
RK, Bussière MT. 1996.
of sexual offender: a meta-analysis. User Report 96-04. Department of
the Solicitor General of Canada: Ottawa, Ontario.
Bussiere MT. 1998.
relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal
of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66: 348-362.
for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist -- Revised. Multi-Health Systems:
SD, Webster CD, Menzies RJ. 1993.
note on portraying the accuracy of violence predictions. Law and Human
Behavior 17: 695-700.
ES, Meehl PE. 1997.
the legal standard for predictions of dangerousness in sex offender commitment
proceedings. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 3: 33-64.
DS, Smith SS, Newman JP. 1990.
the construct validity of psychopathy in black and white male inmates: Three
preliminary studies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 99: 250-259.
Tire, Inc. v. Carmichael. U.S. Supreme Court, 119 S. Ct. 1167.1999.
treatment, and theorizing about sex offenders: Developments during the past twenty
years and future directions. Criminal Justice and Behavior 23: 162-199.
K, Peters J. 1988.
for assessing sex offenders. In: Handbook on Sexual Abuse of Children, Walker
LA (ed.). Springer: New York; 216-246.
GB, Petrila ], Poythress NG, Slobogin C. 1997.
Evaluations for the Courts, 2nd edn. Guilford: New York.
Prediction of Violent Criminal Behavior: A Methodological Critique and Prospectus
in Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions
on Crime Rates. National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC; 244-269.
Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior: An Assessment of Clinical Techniques.
Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.
Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior; A Monograph Series. US Department
of Health and Human Services: Rockville, MD.
RA, Lee AFS, Knight RA, Cerce D. 1997.
rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis. Law and
Human Behavior 21: 635-659.
VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, Cormier CA. 1998.
Offenders; Appraising and Managing Risk. American Psychological
Association: Washington, DC.
judgment survey of mental health professionals: I. An assessment of opinions,
ratings, and knowledge. Journal of Clinical Psychology 50: 941-950.
R, Duncan ]C, Lynett E, Sewell KW. 1994.
analysis of antisocial personality disorder: DSM-IV and beyond. Law and
Human Behavior 18: 471-484.
R, Salekin RT, Sewel1 KW. 1999.
of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for Axis II disorders: Does it
meet the Daubert standard? Law and Human Behavior 23: 425-443.
J, Loss P. 1991.
of the juvenile sex offender. In: Juvenile Sex Offending; Causes,
Consequences, and Corrections, Ryan GD, Lane SL (eds). Lexington: Toronto;
M, Evans M, Fulero S. 1979.
for confirming events: Memory process and the maintenance of social
stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15:
RT, Rogers R, Sewell KW. 1996.
review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy
Checklist-Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical
Psychology; Science and Practice 3: 203-215.
RF, Quattrocchi MR. 1984.
the doctrine of special relationships, and the psychotherapist's duty to warn.
The Journal of Psychiatry and Law 12: 13-37.
A paradigm for exploring some issues in law and psychology. American
Psychologist 33: 224-238.
H, Underwager R. 1998.
violent recidivism: Issues for forensic psychologists. Presented at the 14th
Annual Symposium of the American College of Forensic Psychology, San Francosco,
much of the clinical predictability of dangerousness issue is due to language
and communication difficulties: Some sample courtroom questions and some
inspired but heady answers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and
Comparative Criminology 28: 159-167.
Daubert beyond scientific expert testimony. APA Monitor 30(6):