No-spank bill on way
Mike Zapler, MediaNews Sacramento Bureau, Jan. 18, 2007
< http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/16487654.htm >
SACRAMENTO - The state Legislature is about to weigh in on a
question that stirs impassioned debate among moms and dads: Should
parents spank their children?
Assemblywoman Sally Lieber, D-Mountain View, wants to outlaw
spanking children up to 3 years old. If she succeeds, California
would become the first state in the nation to explicitly ban parents
from smacking their kids.
Making a swat on the behind a misdemeanor might seem a bit much for
some -- and the chances of the idea becoming law appear slim, at
best -- but Lieber begs to differ."I think it's pretty hard to argue you need to beat a child 3 years
old or younger,'' Lieber said. "Is it OK to whip a 1-year-old or a
6-month-old or a newborn?''The bill, which is still being drafted, will be written broadly, she
added, prohibiting "any striking of a child, any corporal
punishment, smacking, hitting, punching, any of that.'' Lieber said
it would be a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail or a
fine up to $1,000, although a legal expert advising her on the
proposal said first-time offenders would probably only have to
attend parenting classes.
The idea is encountering skepticism even before it's been formally
introduced. Beyond the debate among child psychologists -- many of
whom believe limited spanking can be effective -- the bill is sure
to face questions over how practical it is to enforce and opposition
from some legislators who generally oppose what they consider
"nanny government.''
"Where do you stop?'' asked Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, R-Irvine, who
said he personally agrees children under 3 shouldn't be spanked but
has no desire to make it the law."At what point are we going to say we should pass a bill that every parent has to read a minimum of 30 minutes every night to their child? This is right along those same lines.''
One San Jose mother of three said she believes spanking is a poor
way to discipline children, but she also wondered whether a
legislative ban makes sense. Should a mom who slaps her misbehaving
kid in the supermarket, she asked, be liable for a crime?"If my 6-year-old doesn't put his clothes in the hamper, I'm not
going to whack him. He just won't get his clothes washed,'' said
Peggy Hertzberg, 38, who teaches parenting classes at the YWCA. "I think instead of banning spanking, parents need to learn different ways of disciplining and redirecting their children.''Lieber conceived the idea while chatting with a family friend and
legal expert in children's issues worldwide. The friend, Thomas
Nazario, said that while banning spanking might seem like a radical
step for the United States, more than 10 European countries already
do so. Sweden was the first, in 1979.
Nazario said there's no good rationale for hitting a child under 3,
so the state should draw a "bright line'' in the law making it clear."Why do we allow parents to hit a little child and not someone
their own size?'' asked Nazario, a professor at the University of
San Francisco Law School. "Everyone in the state is protected from physical violence, so where do you draw the line? To take a child and spank his little butt until he starts crying, some people would define that as physical violence.''It's unclear how a spanking ban would be enforced. Most slapping,
after all, happens in the confines of a home, and most children up
to age 3 aren't capable of reporting it.
Doctors, social workers and others who believe a child has been
abused are required by law to report it to authorities. Nazario said
he and Lieber are still debating whether to treat slapping the same
way, or simply to encourage those who witness it to report it. But
in either case, said Lieber, the law"would allow people who view a beating to say, `Excuse me, that's against the law.' ''
Experts in child psychology disagree over whether spanking is a
legitimate or effective way for parents to discipline their
children. Professor Robert Larzelere, who has studied child
discipline for 30 years, said his research shows spanking is fine,
as long as it's used sparingly and doesn't escalate to abuse."If it's used in a limited way,'' the Oklahoma State University
professor said, "it can be more effective than almost any other
type of punishment.''He added that children 18 months old or younger shouldn't be spanked at all, because they can't understand why it's happening.
As for Lieber's proposal, the professor said:"I think this proposal is not just a step too far, it's a leap too far. At least from a scientific perspective there really isn't any research to support the idea that this would make things better for children.''
But Lieber is optimistic that lawmakers will find her proposal hard
to resist. For the record, she does not have children and says she
was not slapped as a child. But she does have a cat named Snoop,
which her veterinarian told her never to hit."And if you never hit a cat,'' Lieber said, "you should never hit
a kid.''