Bibliography
[1]
S. J. Dallam, D. H. Gleaves, A. Cepeda-Benito, J. L. Silberg, H. C. Kraemer, D.
Spiegel:
The effects of child sexual abuse: Comment on Rind,
Tromovitch, and Bauserman (1998).
Psychological Bulletin, 127(6):715-733, Nov. 2001.
[2]
David M. Fergusson, Paul E. Mullen:
Childhood Sexual Abuse : An Evidence-Based Perspective, volume 40 of Developmental
Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry.
Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1999.
[3]
K. A. Kendall-Tackett, L. M. Williams, David Finkelhor: Impact of sexual abuse
on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies.
Psychological Bulletin, 113:164-180, 1993.
[4]
Harris Mirkin:
Sex, Science, and Sin.
Sexuality & Culture, 4(2):82-100, 2000.
http://www.ipce.org/Library/mirkin_rind_frame.htm
[5]
Thomas D. Oellerich:
Rind, Tromovitch, Bauserman : Politically Incorrect--Scientifically Correct.
Sexuality & Culture, 4(2):67-81, 2000.
Deutsche Ü bersetzung:
Rind,
Tromovitch und Bauserman: Ihre meta-analytische Studie ist politisch
"unkorrekt", doch wissenschaftlich hieb- und stichfest;
und bei Arcados: http://www.arcados.ch/wissen/indexwissen.html#oellerich
[6]
S. J. Ondersma, M. Chaffin, L. Berliner, I. Cordon, G. S. Goodman, D. Barnett:
Sex with children is abuse: Comment on Rind, Tromovitch, and
Bauserman (1998).
Psychological Bulletin, 127(6):707-714, Nov. 2001.
[7]
Jochen Paulus:
Streit um sexuellen Missbrauch : Forscher sind sich uneinig, wie
gefhrlich sexueller Missbrauch fr betroffene Kinder sein kann.
Tagesanzeiger (Zrich), 16 January 2002.
http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/ta/taOnlineArtikel?ArtId=155373
[8]
B. Rind, R. Bauserman, P. Tromovitch:
Science versus orthodoxy: Anatomy of the congressional condemnation of a
scientific article and reflections on remedies for future ideological attacks.
Applied & Preventive Psychology, 9(4):211-226, Fall 2000.
http://www.ipce.info/library_2/rbt_science_frame.htm
[9]
B. Rind, P. Tromovitch, R. Bauserman:
The validity and appropriateness of methods, analyses, and
conclusions in Rind et al. (1998): A rebuttal of victimological critique
from Ondersma et al. (2001) and Dallam et al. (2001).
Psychological Bulletin, 127(6):734-758, Nov. 2001.
[10]
Bruce Rind, Richard Bauserman, Philip Tromovitch:
The Condemmned Meta-Analysis on Child Sexual Abuse : Good Science and
Long-Overdue Skepticism.
Skeptical Inquirer, 25(4):68-72, 2001.
http://www.ipce.org/Library/rbt_skept.htm
Deutsche Ü bersetzung:
Meta-Analyse des sexuellen Mißbrauchs; Sie
wurde verurteilt,
doch war sie gute Forschung und brachte lang-überfällige Skepsis
[11]
Bruce Rind, Philip Tromovitch:
A meta-analytic review of findings from national samples on psychological
correlates of child sexual abuse.
Journal of Sex Research, 34:237-255, 1997.
[12]
Bruce Rind, Philip Tromovitch, Robert Bauserman:
A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using
College Samples.
Psychological Bulletin, 124(1):22-53, 1998.
http://www.ipce.org/Library/metaana.htm
[13]
Bruce Rind, Philip Tromovitch, Robert Bauserman:
Condemnation of a scientific article: A chronology and refutation of the attacks
and a discussion of threats to the integrity of science.
Sexuality & Culture, 4(2):1-62, 2000.
http://www.ipce.info/library_2/rtb_condemn_frame.htm
[14]
Stephen Robertson:
Separating the Men from the Boys: Masculinity, Psychosexual Development, and Sex
Crime in the United States, 1930s-1960s.
Journal of the History Of Medicine and Allied Sciences,
56(1):3-35, 2001.
|