When Does Ordinary Law Enforcement Become a "War on Crime?"
Corey Yung, concurringopinions.com, March 27, 2009
In 1971, Richard Nixon declared the War on Drugs in America.
[... ... ...]
In a paper I have been working on for a while that I will be presenting at the Law & Society Conference, I contend
that a criminal war on sex offenders may have already begun. We are,
thus, in a period like that in the late 60's and early 70's wherein the conflict has started even if the government has not yet acknowledged it.
In reviewing America's history of criminal wars, I have identified three
major characteristics of those conflicts. The first two are essential
prerequisites for the war to begin and the third is a sign that it is
there must be a substantial campaign of myth creation.
For the war on drugs, movies like Reefer Madness embodied the
misinformation that was propagated to support government policy against
In regards to the nascent war on sex offenders, there are already
developed myths of the prevalence of stranger rape, of child molesters
lurking in the bushes, that offenders cannot be "cured" based upon
faulty recidivism statistics, and of the collective nature of the class
there must be a significant marshalling of resources in proportion to the perceived threat.
For sex offenders, policy innovation has created an environment at the federal, state, and
local levels whereby offenders have a significant weight upon them.
|Lifetime registration, |
| residency restrictions, |
| civil commitment,
lifetime real-time GPS monitoring, |
| castration, |
| community notification, and |
| work restrictions |
are just a few of the policies that have targeted sex offenders.
The treatment of offenders seems out of proportion given
that previously convicted and released sex offenders are only
responsible for a small portion of sex crimes.
However, the marshalling of resources is still incomplete. The Adam Walsh Child Protection and
Safety Act, the most significant piece of federal sex offender legislation, has not been fully funded to enforce its various
provisions. Perhaps with the economic downturn and a new administration,
the focus of criminal justice resources on sex offenders might yet
|Third, and importantly for non-sex offenders,
an inevitable result of criminal wars is exception-making to various protected rights.
The drug war has arguably limited the rights protected under the First, Second,
Fourth, Fifth, Fourteenth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments.
Further, federal authority has expanded well beyond the previous reaches of the
Commerce Clause. These "exceptions" to prior doctrine have had long-term
implications outside of the drug war.
Similarly, the war on sex offenders through registration laws has limited due process rights,
changed Ex Post Facto doctrine, and further expanded the federal reach
under the Commerce Clause. Residency restrictions have revived banishment as punishment in a way that is detrimental to basic aspects
of American democracy. Other punishments have already curtailed First,
Fifth, Fourteenth and Sixth Amendment protections.|
So, based upon those criteria, I think a strong case that a war on sex
offenders has already begun. There is a chance that through court
decisions, state noncompliance with the Adam Walsh Act, or failure to
fully fund the various sex offender laws, that the war could falter.
However, based upon the politics of crime, it seems likely that America
has started a new war on the criminal front.