Court reverses spanking ruling, ends family's nightmare
Judge: 'We are unwilling to prohibit corporal punishment'
WorldNetDaily, June 2, 2008
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled Friday that a father who spanked his 12-year-old son 36 times with a maple paddle did not commit physical abuse.
The unanimous ruling finalized the reversal of a lower court's decision, which did deem the punishment administered by Shawn Fraser of Bloomington, Minn., abusive.
The case passed through three courts (county, district and state Supreme) while lawyers and judges argued whether there was any evidence of physical or mental harm from the spankings.
The guardian ad litem, an attorney appointed to represent the children's interests, argued that while there was no evidence of injury, inflicting pain should be grounds enough for establishing abuse.
The Supreme Court disagreed.
The law allows "reasonable discipline," the ruling said, and
According to court documents, the Fraser family's oldest son, Gerard, had been caught sneaking out of the house on numerous occasions and lying about his whereabouts. After attempting grounding and other punishments to curb the behavior, the Gerard's parents (devout Christians) discussed biblical verses on corporal punishment with their son and posted the verses on the family fridge.
Gerard was warned that if he snuck out again or was overtly disrespectful to his parents, he would be paddled once for each year of his age.
On the evening of June 29, 2005, Gerard again snuck out, only to be caught by a younger sibling. Gerard's father paddled him 12 times.
The boy was spanked again 12 times after "throwing a temper tantrum." When Gerard then grabbed a knife and threatened self-injury, his father disarmed him and spanked him 12 times more - a total of 36 swats administered in intervals over an hour's time span.
According to reports, there were no marks or signs of injury on the boy.
Later that evening, the boy snuck out again and was apprehended by the police. Six days later, county human services filed a petition alleging that both of the Fraser boys were in need of protection, and subsequently, the boys were removed into foster care.
Jill Waite, an attorney for Shawn Fraser, told the St. Paul Pioneer Press that the family's 6-month separation was agonizing. The 11-year-old younger son "didn't believe that he would ever be back with his family again," Waite said.
With the help of attorneys, however, the boys were returned to their home, two days before Christmas.
As a condition of keeping the boys, Shawn Fraser agreed to discontinue spanking until the courts finalized their rulings. The family remained under the supervision of the county child protective services.
A Hennepin County court eventually ruled that, largely because of the spankings, the Fraser home was "a dangerous environment" and that Shawn Fraser's treatment of the boy constituted "physical abuse."
Shawn Fraser then appealed the case, where a district appeals court affirmed that parents enjoy "a wide latitude regarding the discipline of their children," took into account the child's size (5 feet 2 inches, 195 pounds) and ruled the measures non-abusive. Hennepin County, however, appealed the case to the state Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court's Friday ruling upheld the appeals court decision and declined to return the case to lower courts for any further findings.
The ruling now marks the end of three long years of lawyers, allegations, investigations and protective services for the Fraser family.
Gerard Fraser, now 15, told the Star Tribune that he's glad the case is settled.
Waite told the St. Paul Pioneer Press that the whole family is elated.