Table 5

Level of Consent and Psychological Correlates 

for CSA in Male College Students 

Using Corrected rs by Analysis

Vorige Start Omhoog Volgende

[Page 745]

Note

CSA = child sexual abus;:
k
= number of samples in the meta-analysis;
N
= total number of participants in the k samples;
rc
= unbiased effect size estimate based on base-rate corrected rs:
CI = confidence interval for rc ;
Chi2 = within-group homogeneity statistic (based on dl = k -I);
zcontrast = comparison of the all-types and no-consent effect size estimates;
Ncontrast = total number of participants in the all-types and unwanted levels;
p
= p value associated with zcontrast
a Reproduces Dallam et al.'s own analysis in their Table 7 based on their collected rs from their Table 6.
b Represents our computation of their Table 6 corrected r values.
c Represents analysis of corrected rs based on our original effect sizes from Rind et al. (1998) in the Appendix-
* p
< .05, in homogeneity analysis.

 

Consent

k

N

rc

95% CI

Chi2

zcontrast

Ncontrast

p

Dallam et al. (2001) a

All types 10 1,525 .11 .05 - .19 7.92      
Unwanted 4 826 .22 .13 - .30 1.93      

Dallam et al. (2001) redone b

All types 10 1,855 .10 .06 - .15 21.37* 3.63 2,845 .0003
Unwanted 4 990 .24 .18 - .30 3.30      

Rind, Tromovitch, & Bauserman (current) corrected rs c

All types 10 1,855 .08 .03 - .12 17.58* 3.45 2,845 .0006
Unwanted 4 990 .21 .15 - .27 1.06      

Vorige Start Omhoog Volgende